Is She Confused?

Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, opined in his Res ipsa loquitur blog that US Virgin Islands Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D) is mistaken about our Constitution. She did, after all, have a few things to say during the just concluded vote for a House of Representatives Speaker concerning the status of the USVI (and other territories) in our nation. She demanded, in those remarks, the “right” of territorial delegates to vote on matters before the House.

This body and this nation has [sic] a territories and a colonies problem.

And

I note that the names of representatives from American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia were not called, representing, collectively, 4 million Americans. Mr Speaker, collectively, the largest per capita of veterans in this country.

As Turley noted in the body of his essay,

The language of the Constitution is clear and unambiguous. Absent an amendment to the Constitution, only states may vote on the floor of the United States House of Representatives.

He also cited the relevant clause of our Constitution, Art I, Sect 2:

The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch in the States Legislature.

Plaskett, a duly qualified and certified lawyer, isn’t at all mistaken; she’s acting quite deliberately. She’s all too typical, too, of the Progressive-Democratic Party’s contempt for and disregard of our Constitution, canonically illustrated by ex-President Barack Obama’s (D) announcement that if Congress would not do as he told it, he would exercise his pen and telephone to bypass or overrule it, and by soon-to-be ex-President Joe Biden’s (D) lack of concern for the unconstitutionality of his student loan “forgiveness” scheme with his serial cancelations of those loans. Party’s attitude is one that reaches back at least as far as the then-Democratic Party’s head, Woodrow Wilson, who insisted that our Constitution was obsolete, in the way, and needed to be put aside in favor of his party’s Technocrat-centered “leadership.”

Progressive-Democrats and Heinously Violent Illegal Aliens

DOGE co-chair and X owner Elon Musk is correct on this one. Last September, the House passed a bill that would expel illegal[aliens] convicted of sex offenses. The vote then was all 215 Republicans present voted Aye, 58 Progressive-Democrats Aye, and 158 Progressive-Democrats Nay.

In addition to those deportations, the bill would

deem illegal [aliens] who admit to domestic violence or sex-related charges—or are convicted of them—to be inadmissible in the US.

Musk wants those shameful 158 voted out of office at the next election. He posted on X

There is no excuse. Please post the list of people who opposed this law and want to keep illegals who are convicted sex offenders in America[.]

Mario Nawfal, self-styled Host of the Largest Show on X:

WHY DID 158 DEMOCRATS VOTE TO KEEP SEX OFFENDERS IN THE U.S.?
In September 2024, the House passed a bill to deport undocumented immigrants convicted of sex crimes.
Every single Republican and 51 Democrats voted in favor. Shockingly, 158 Democrats opposed it.
The bill targeted rapists, pedophiles, domestic abusers, and stalkers, ensuring they couldn’t stay in the U.S.
Opponents claimed it “demonized immigrants,” but how does protecting convicted predators help anyone—especially their victims?
Deporting violent offenders isn’t “fearmongering”—it’s basic public safety.
Why would anyone vote to keep criminals who prey on women and children?

Courtesy of the House Clerk via the first link above, these are the shameful 158:

    Terri Sewell  Alabama
    Pete Aguilar  California
    Nanette Barragán  California
    Ami Bera  California
    Julia Brownley  California
    Salud Carbajal  California
    Tony Cárdenas  California
    Judy Chu  California
    Luis Correa  California
    Jim Costa  California
    Mark DeSaulnier  California
    Anna Eshoo  California
    John Garamendi  California
    Robert Garcia  California
    Jimmy Gomez  California
    Jared Huffman  California
    Sara Jacobs  California
    Sydney Kamlager-Dove  California
    Ro Khanna  California
    Barbara Lee  California
    Ted Lieu  California
    Zoe Lofgren  California
    Doris Matsui  California
    Kevin Mullin  California
    Grace Napolitano  California
    Nancy Pelosi  California
    Scott Peters  California
    Katie Porter  California
    Raul Ruiz  California
    Linda Sánchez  California
    Adam Schiff  California
    Brad Sherman  California
    Mark Takano  California
    Mike Thompson  California
    Norma Torres  California
    Juan Vargas  California
    Maxine Waters  California
    Jason Crow  Colorado
    Diana DeGette  Colorado
    Joe Neguse  Colorado
    Brittany Pettersen  Colorado
    Rosa DeLauro  Connecticut
    James Himes  Connecticut
    John Larson  Connecticut
    Lisa Blunt Rochester  Delaware
    Kathy Castor  Florida
    Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick  Florida
    Lois Frankel  Florida
    Maxwell Frost  Florida
    Darren Soto  Florida
    Debbie Wasserman Schultz  Florida
    Frederica Wilson  Florida
    Sanford D. Bishop Jr.  Georgia
    Henry “Hank” Johnson  Georgia
    Lucy McBath  Georgia
    David Scott  Georgia
    Nikema Williams  Georgia
    Ed Case  Hawaii
    Jill Tokuda  Hawaii
    Sean Casten  Illinois
    Danny Davis  Illinois
    Bill Foster  Illinois
    Jesús “Chuy” Garcia  Illinois
    Jonathan Jackson  Illinois
    Robin Kelly  Illinois
    Raja Krishnamoorthi  Illinois
    Mike Quigley  Illinois
    Delia Ramirez  Illinois
    Janice Schakowsky  Illinois
    Bradley Schneider  Illinois
    Lauren Underwood  Illinois
    André Carson  Indiana
    Morgan McGarvey  Kentucky
    Troy Carter  Louisiana
    Chellie Pingree  Maine
    Steny Hoyer  Maryland
    Glenn Ivey  Maryland
    Kweisi Mfume  Maryland
    Jamie Raskin  Maryland
    C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger  Maryland
    John Sarbanes  Maryland
    David Trone  Maryland
    Jake Auchincloss  Massachusetts
    Katherine Clark  Massachusetts
    Bill Keating  Massachusetts
    James McGovern  Massachusetts
    Seth Moulton  Massachusetts
    Richard Neal  Massachusetts
    Ayanna Pressley  Massachusetts
    Lori Trahan  Massachusetts
    Debbie Dingell  Michigan
    Dan Kildee  Michigan
    Haley Stevens  Michigan
    Shri Thanedar  Michigan
    Rashida Tlaib  Michigan
    Betty McCollum  Minnesota
    Ilhan Omar  Minnesota
    Dean Phillips  Minnesota
    Bennie Thompson  Mississippi
    Cori Bush  Missouri
    Emanuel Cleaver  Missouri
    Ann Kuster  New Hampshire
    Andy Kim  New Jersey
    Rob Menendez  New Jersey
    Donald Norcross  New Jersey
    Frank Pallone  New Jersey
    Bonnie Watson Coleman  New Jersey
    Teresa Leger Fernandez  New Mexico
    Melanie Stansbury  New Mexico
    Jamaal Bowman  New York
    Yvette Clarke  New York
    Adriano Espaillat  New York
    Dan Goldman  New York
    Hakeem Jeffries  New York
    Gregory Meeks  New York
    Grace Meng  New York
    Joseph Morelle  New York
    Jerrold Nadler  New York
    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez  New York
    Paul Tonko  New York
    Ritchie Torres  New York
    Nydia Velázquez  New York
    Alma Adams  North Carolina
    Valerie Foushee  North Carolina
    Deborah Ross  North Carolina
    Joyce Beatty  Ohio
    Shontel Brown  Ohio
    Greg Landsman  Ohio
    Earl Blumenauer  Oregon
    Suzanne Bonamici  Oregon
    Valerie Hoyle  Oregon
    Madeleine Dean  Pennsylvania
    Summer Lee  Pennsylvania
    Mary Scanlon  Pennsylvania
    Gabe Amo  Rhode Island
    James Clyburn  South Carolina
    Steve Cohen  Tennessee
    Greg Casar  Texas
    Joaquin Castro  Texas
    Jasmine Crockett  Texas
    Lloyd Doggett  Texas
    Veronica Escobar  Texas
    Lizzie Fletcher  Texas
    Sylvia Garcia  Texas
    Al Green  Texas
    Marc Veasey  Texas
    Becca Balint  Vermont
    Donald Beyer  Virginia
    Gerald Connolly  Virginia
    Jennifer McClellan  Virginia
    Robert “Bobby” Scott  Virginia
    Suzan DelBene  Washington
    Pramila Jayapal  Washington
    Derek Kilmer  Washington
    Rick Larsen  Washington
    Marilyn Strickland  Washington
    Gwen Moore  Wisconsin
    Mark Pocan  Wisconsin

As a Texan, I’m most disgusted by those shameful nine; although, with Casar and Castro at the head of that list (if only alphabetically), I’m not at all surprised that these Progressive-Democrats are so protective of such heinous illegal aliens. Party has been all too protective of criminals and dismissive of victims these last years.

Why Indeed

Elizabeth Braw, of the Atlantic Council, in her Friday Wall Street Journal op-ed, wondered why the People’s Republic of China would want to undermine global shipping.

Undermining the global maritime order seems an odd strategy for a country that owes its rapid economic rise to the oceans.

It’s not an odd strategy at all. The PRC has observed the economic, political, and military power that has accrued to the United States since WWII by our nation’s control of the seas and protection of global shipping. The aggressively acquisitive PRC (South China Sea; East China Sea; naval bases around the world, including Atlantic Ocean coastal Africa and Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean coastal South America) is now sailing a formidable combat navy and a very large dual use merchant marine fleet. The PRC also has publicly stated its goal of supplanting the US as the global hegemon.

The PRC, with that globally capable navy and merchant marine, now believes it can achieve that.

The straight and simply stated answer to Braw’s question is that the PRC doesn’t want to undermine global shipping at all. It wants to be the power that controls it, with all of that economic, political, and military power redounding to it and with the parallel result of a reduction of the US by the same magnitude.

Sometimes political science isn’t rocket science.

A Good Start

Arizona State Senator Warren Petersen (R), who also is the President of the Arizona Senate, promoted his State’s agency sunset law as a model for the Federal government. To make his promotion concrete, he offered this language, based on that Arizona statute, for the incoming Congress and President:

Notwithstanding any other law, beginning on an eight-year rotating basis on September 30, 2025, the statutory authorization for each agency, as defined in 5 USC § 551, shall expire, and such agency shall have no authority to engage in rulemaking, adjudication, licensing, other agency action, or enforcement of any law or rule from that date forward until Congress passes a separate joint resolution of reauthorization for the agency for an additional eight-year period.

That’s short and sweet, as appropriate for all statutes Congress seeks to enact (but fails to do across the board, a separate problem), but I’d take it a bit further, without too much more verbiage.

I’d add substitute in some words that make this law applicable to all agencies created after this law’s enactment, particularly including agencies created by Executive Order (vis., the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which has ruined itself through politicization, aided and abetted by the Biden administration) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a combination of Congressional statute and Executive Branch fiat.

Rather than simply having the statutory authorization expire, I’d make explicit that that includes zeroing out its budget, including payroll; returning the employees to the private sector rather than merely reassigning them elsewhere in the Federal government Leviathan; and that the agency no longer exists.

I’d require, too, the reauthorization actions to be via stand-alone bills, with nothing included that is apart from this single subject.

Finally, to ensure the reauthorization isn’t simply a mindless rubber stamp by the Congress, I’d require the reauthorization to be by separate House of Representatives and Senate vote, with each house’s vote required to be by a supermajority of 60% of elected Congressmen (not 60% of those present or those voting Abstain or Present).

Thus:

Notwithstanding any other law, beginning on an eight-year rotating basis on September 30, 2025, the statutory authorization for each agency, as defined in 5 USC § 551 or created after September 30, 2025 by statute or by Executive action, shall expire, and such agency shall cease to exist, no agency personnel reassignable elsewhere within the Federal government, until each house of Congress separately passes by a 60% majority vote of sitting Representatives and by a 60% majority vote of Senators a separate, standalone reauthorization for the agency for an additional eight-year period.

Retreating from Net-Zero?

That’s the claim of The Wall Street Journal editors.

The climate policy retreat is accelerating as Citigroup, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley this week joined an exodus from the Net-Zero Banking Alliance. Energy reality can bite.

The “retreat” consists of five banks out of the 140 that are members of the NZBA, a gang of banks sworn to refuse the business of any enterprise that isn’t sufficiently climate-sensitive and -activist enough to suit the syndicate. It’s true enough that the five are major players in the world of banking, but they’re still only five.

The editors wrote, also, that mutual fund manager Vanguard had pulled out of the Net Zero Asset Managers pledge. That’s one out of 350 enterprises that took that pledge. The editors wrote further that JPMorgan Asset Management, BlackRock, and State Street Global Advisors have left Climate Action 100+, a collection of some 600 investors who pressure businesses to comply. Three are part of this “retreat.”

However.

Leaving these syndicates and changing their ways of climate-woke behaviors are two different things. We need to see these banks’, investors’, and business’ altered behaviors over some period of time before it’s believable that they’ve changed more than their public rhetoric.