Recall the New York Times‘ publication of an article slandering Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh with an unfounded accusation of sexual misbehavior toward a young woman decades ago at a college party. Recall further that the NYT later “corrected” its claim with an “Editor’s Note” buried in the original smear piece instead of placing its Note prominently.
There’s more to this story. The smear piece, excerpted from a forthcoming book as part of a marketing effort for that book, was written by the authors of the book. They excerpted their own book.
Recall that the New York Times, just a very few days ago, reprinted an excerpt from a Clinton lawyer’s book that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh had inflicted an obscene act on a young woman while he was a college student at a “drunken dorm party.”
Immediately on publication, Progressive-Democratic Party Presidential candidates and sitting Senators Kamala Harris (CA), Elizabeth Warren (MA), Bernie Sanders (VT), Cory Booker (NJ), along with fellow candidates ex-Congressman Robert Francis O’Rourke, and ex-HUD Secretary Julian Castro all demanded Kavanaugh’s immediate impeachment.
Then the NYT, having been caught in its lie, had to print a “correction” in the form of an…Editor’s Note…buried in the article:
The people of Hong Kong are in their 15th straight week of protest against the People’s Republic of China’s moves to intervene in Hong Kong’s internal affairs, to impose yet more PRC controls over a nominally free, “two systems” city.
People of all ages, many unmasked and some carrying children, walked more than 2 miles from a shopping district, where usually busy stores were shuttered, to downtown Hong Kong. Many chanted, “Five demands! Not one less!,” “Fight for freedom!” and “Revolution of our times!”
Those five demands, which do not add up to freedom, but are a necessary early step on the path to freedom, are these:
First up is this petty (and more) move by the Veterans Administration.
Congressman Brian Mast (R, FL)a retired Army Ranger, spoke out on Thursday after he was evicted from his congressional office space in the West Palm Beach Veteran Affairs Medical Center.
The move came after Mast, who lost his legs in an explosion in Afghanistan in 2010, grilled a Department of Veteran Affairs official at a hearing earlier this year.
After a spate of veteran suicides in VA facilities, Mast questioned a number of VA officials last April. Now the VA wants him out of that office space:
[T]he Oregon AFL-CIO wants voters to limit self-checkout kiosks in grocery stores.
The State’s Attorney General still has to sign off on the union’s ballot measure, ironically titled the Grocery Store Service and Community Protection Act, but that’s a formality in a State that favors Antifa violence over law and order and actual protection of communities.
The union claims—and it’s serious—that
self-service checkouts add “to social isolation and related negative health consequences” for shoppers.
That’s the headline of Walter Hussman’s piece in Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal. Impartiality certainly is a contributor, but the Critical Item for a newspaper’s credibility—for any journalistic entity—is integrity.
To set themselves on the path back to honesty, and so to believability—not just credibility—members of the journalism industry must address these items:
identify at least some of their sources
if an anonymous source refuses to be identified, show two things
-the source actually exists
-why the source should be believed
if the anonymous source is a whistleblower, show that the source has exhausted all internal whistleblowing channels before deciding to leak
pleaded with a Boston federal judge Friday to spare her jail time after she pleaded guilty in connection with the college admissions bribery scandal and instead give her probation, community service and a fine.
This is an even lighter sentence than the prosecutors are requesting. Apparently, what amounts to a crime of bribery is no big deal. Furthermore, the “fine” of $20,000 is an insult. That’s pocket money for someone of Huffman’s means and income.
Senior MPs opposing a no-deal Brexit sought assurances from the EU that their bid for a three-month delay would be granted, it has emerged.
European leaders were sounded out before MPs, including the “rebel alliance,” passed a bill…forcing Boris Johnson to ask for an extension.
For the EU to participate in such scruffy deal would seem to be a naked interference in sovereign British domestic politics.
On the one hand, this is those MPs selling out British sovereignty.
Our individual liberty—and liberties—depend on a number of things: sovereignty of us citizens over our government; understanding that our rights and duties are inherent in us as gifts from our Creator and not grants from that government; the tools with which to enforce those rights and duties—free speech and religion, keeping and bearing arms, among others. And an ability to trust one another.
The Second Amendment be damned. You see liberals don’t really trust regular people. They prefer a system where a small set of elites in Washington make decisions for everybody else. Including on issues of self-defense.