Vice President Mike Pence doesn’t think it’s a done deal that the Progressive-Democrats have the votes in the House to impeach President Donald Trump.
He’s operating from a misunderstanding of the Progressive-Democrats’ purpose. Their move has nothing to do with impeachment—they know they have no case based on what they’ve leaked from their secret hearings and what’s been exposed in both their committees’ public hearings—and everything to do with smearing Trump and poisoning the upcoming election.
As Al Green (D, TX) has made clear.
Congressman Jim Banks (R, IN) wants to subpoena Congressman Adam Schiff’s (D, CA) telephone records in retaliation for Schiff’s releasing the personal call records of a fellow Congressman, journalists, and President Donald Trump’s personal lawyers.
This is why I’ve called for a tit for tat.
Banks’ anger is understandable, but his proposed retaliatory move is misguided. The Congressman whose call record was so dishonestly publicized by Schiff, Devin Nunes, has the better response: deal with Schiff’s dishonesty and his abuse of subpoenas in court, not with revenge.
DoJ says it wants to “streamline” negotiations over the size of penalties misbehaving white collar employees should pay.
Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski, the head of the department’s criminal division—which overseas various white-collar criminal investigations—said the DOJ has sought to reduce the time it takes to negotiate resolutions by grounding proposed fines in US sentencing guidelines and other objective criteria.
Here’s a thought on how to streamline those negotiations.
Stop negotiating. Make a plea offer (rarely, these too often get used to extort guilty pleas of any sort), and if the white collar declines—no back and forth—go to criminal trial. Better, if DoJ thinks it has an actual case, go straight to criminal trial.
Facebook had a post up, recently, that the government of Singapore didn’t like and of which that government disputed the truthfulness.
As a result, By Order Of the Singapore government, Facebook added a notice—a “label”—to the post:
Facebook is legally required to tell you that the Singapore government says this post has false information.
For a wonder, Facebook didn’t take the post down, nor did it make any effort to “correct” its content. Instead, it posted the notice, letting readers decide for themselves…whether they should take seriously the post or the notice required by a mendacious government.
Although, had it been me, I would have ignored it, not dignifying the thing with a response.
“It” is House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler’s (D, NY) pro forma invitation to President Donald Trump to send along his lawyer to be present at the Nadler Impeachment Inquisition, so long as Trump responded by Nadler’s deadline with the lawyer’s name and impeachment areas of interest.
The smart move was Trump’s refusal to accede to Nadler’s demand.
Press rumor has it that the DOJ’s IG report will call out an FBI lawyer for falsifying an email used by the FISA court to authorize the FBI to spy on monitor a Trump 2016 campaign advisor. Press rumor further has it that the IG report also will say the court would have authorized the…monitoring…regardless.
Let’s assume that first rumor is true. This is no minor matter; this is no loaf of bread stolen to feed the man’s family, in which some compassion might be felt for the felon. This was a loaf of bread stolen because the man could. This was a loaf of bread stolen explicitly to hurt someone else. And in the end, this was a far more serious crime than merely stealing a loaf.
The guild’s latest lie began with a UN lie: Manfred Nowak’s (Independent Expert leading the United Nations Global Study on Children Deprived of Liberty) claim that
100,000 migrant children were detained by the Trump administration and indicated that it was the “world’s highest rate” of detained children.
Then Nowak was forced to confess that the number was cribbed from ex-President Barack Obama (D) administration statistics and that it was Obama who had detained those 100,000 children.
Guild dishonesty that flowed from that was broad.
Fox News‘ Howard Kurtz objected to MSNBC‘s use of Mr Kellyanne Conway, George, as a commentator on the President Donald Trump impeachment hearings. He’s quite right in this but he missed a larger point wit this remark:
Kurtz said it was shocking to him that television networks would cover impeachment hearings only with partisan commentators and political pundits, rather than leaving it chiefly in the hands of bonafide journalists.
Maybe that’s because there aren’t any bonafide journalists; there are only partisan commentators and political…pundits in the journalism guild.
They have a homeless problem, and they seem oblivious to it.
Oakland has seen a 47% jump in homelessness—one of the largest surges of any California city, according to a one-night street count released in July. The count, which used federal guidelines, showed Oakland had 4,071 homeless people in 2019, up from 2,761 in 2017. The increase puts the city’s per capita homeless rate higher than neighboring San Francisco and Berkeley and comes at a time when several West Coast cities are struggling with a homeless crisis that’s being driven by rising rents, drug addiction, mental illness and pushback from progressives.
Now styled US Olympic & Paralympic Committee, the body objects to being held accountable for its abominable handling of the sexual abuse of so many of its athletes for so long—indeed for its active suppression of complaints about those abuses. The Senate Commerce Committee voted to send to the floor for debate and vote a bill that would authorize
Congress to vote to dissolve [the USOPC] board of directors and terminate any national governing body, which run specific sports within the U.S.
USOPC Chief Executive Sarah Hirshland had sent the Committee a letter threatening objecting to that: