That’s the headline of a Deutsche Welle piece regarding the impact on Europe of President Donald Trump’s withdrawal of the US from ex-President Barack Obama’s (D) Executive Agreement that sought to codify Iran’s “right” to obtain nuclear weapons, if Iran were to have only a little patience and wait until the Agreement’s blocks, such as they are, expire in a few years.
Then Ten Schultz, the author of the article, opened with this statement.
The United States’ withdrawal from the Iran deal, despite the personal pleadings of Europe’s most powerful politicians, has provided one more example that President Donald Trump has no hesitation in dismissing European interests and trans-Atlantic concerns.
This is a preview of
“Iran deal: The European Union’s ugly options”
. Read the full post (517 words, estimated 2:04 mins reading time)
…the door hit them in the fanny on the way out.
About a dozen Google employees are resigning in protest over the tech giant’s involvement in Project Maven, a controversial military program that uses artificial intelligence, Gizmodo reports.
Maven is a DoD project for developing an AI capability to quickly process vast amounts of drone-generated data for human decision-makers. Such a capability, if successfully developed, would enhance our war-fighting—and especially our war-winning—capability.
These ex-employees should consider their view of citizenship in light of their view that the US should not be allowed to take steps to defend itself.
Much has been made over the last week, both favorably and unfavorably, of the magnitude of President Donald Trump’s erasure of ex-President Barack Obama’s (D) legacy.
I disagree with that coverage. Trump has been mitigating, if not correcting, as many of Obama’s errors as he can, but he’s done nothing about Obama’s legacy, which includes the following far from exhaustive list:
- apologizing to the world for our successes
- bowing to world leaders, deeply on several occasions
- alienating our friends and toadying up to our enemies
- attacking Israel for insisting on defending itself
It’s epitomized by a carefully unsigned piece in Spiegel Online, coming only from “Der Spiegel Staff.” After you’ve read it, you’ll see why the author(s) were too embarrassed to sign their names to it.
…Trump’s Tuesday announcement that the US was withdrawing from the nuclear agreement with Iran, one of the core pieces of international diplomacy in recent years….
New York City has a program, Expanded Success Initiative, that was intended to improve the city’s K-12 “black and Latino males'” (apparently, the girls just don’t matter in New York City) performance. It’s failing; although, the piece at the link is more optimistic than that.
Students…reported better school relationships and more fair treatment than peers in comparable schools outside the program.
Socialization does matter in a child’s development; however….
[A]cademic outcomes and suspension rates remained roughly similar to those in the comparison schools.
Academics are the primary purpose of schools. ESI improved nothing important.
State and local governments are at it again. Or still.
The value of investments by public pension funds declined last quarter, widening the gap between what these funds say they will earn and what they actually earn. Pension fund managers—especially government pension fund managers—must make annual “estimates” (they’re actually politically self-serving pie-in-the-sky claims) of the market returns they expect to make on the funds under their nominal care. These WAGs determine the amount of money “the government that is affiliated with the pension fund must pay into it”.
The dishonesty of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s case against ex- and brief-Trump Campaign Manager is made manifest in the opening questions Eastern District of Virginia Federal Judge TS Ellis III and Michael Dreeben’s (arguing for the Mueller side) answers.
Apparently, if I look at the indictment, none of that information has anything to do with links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of Donald Trump. That seems to me to be obvious because they all long predate any contact or any affiliation of this defendant with the campaign.
House investigating committees have demanded that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein turn over his letter to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and Rosenstein has refused to do so. Now, in a case Mueller brought against ex- and brief-Trump Campaign Manager Paul Rosenstein, the presiding Federal judge TS Ellis has demanded that Mueller turn over to him an unredacted copy of that letter, and he’s given Mueller two weeks to comply, which works out to 18 May.
We’ll see. Two weeks is much too long to give Mueller to produce his copy of Rosenstein’s authorizing letter; 36-48 hours is plenty—especially since Mueller’s team plainly has that copy always ready to hand; they are, after all, responsible persons.
At the tail end of a Wall Street Journal article discussing the relationship between Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Congress (and in particular the House Freedom Caucus), Rosenstein made this remark:
We have a responsibility to work with the Congress. They have a responsibility to understand their duty is not to interfere.
This is a breathtaking lack of understanding by a Federal lawyer. Oversight by Congress does not mean simply watching. Interference is absolutely required if Congress, through its oversight, detects inappropriate or wrong behaviors.
Or would Rosenstein insist that funding cuts—Congress doing its job—are interference?
Here’s a stat from Spectator Index.
The people of most of those nations would appear to prefer to be slaves of a conqueror. The top two nations, on the other hand, have recent and direct experience with Russian dominance. Which makes Poland’s poor attitude surprising.
On the other hand, the general attitudes of the NATO nations makes one wonder about the utility of NATO at all, and whether we wouldn’t be better served by forming a mutual defense alliance with those eastern European nations that still have some self respect—many of which aren’t listed in the poll.