The Institute for Justice summarized a 10th Circuit case regarding a car involved in an immediately prior weapons case, its driver, and a weapon thusly:
Aurora, CO, police run tags on car with broken tail light, discover the car was seized three weeks earlier in weapons-possession case and a man (a known gang member) associated with the car was arrested. They pull it over; the man is in it; they frisk him and find a gun. He’s charged with being a felon in possession. Suppress the evidence? No need, says the 10th Circuit. Though he was calm and compliant, officers were justified in patting him down to ensure their safety.
Dissent: The gov’t is going to use this decision to justify frisks in a much broader variety of circumstances than the ones here.
Here’s the new US offer regarding the Iran nuclear weapons deal; we’ll soon see pretty clearly the mindsets of Germany, France, and the UK. And of Iran.
- end nuclear weapons development in perpetuity
- stop all uranium enrichment
- never preprocess plutonium
- allow nuclear unqualified access to all sites throughout the country
- withdraw all forces from Syria
- end support for militant groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon, youths militia and Taliban in Afghanistan, and the IRGC Quds Forces
- stop sending arms to the Houthi militia in Yemen
- release all US citizens
I got an online newspaper survey (requested by a highly respected paper), and one of the questions opened a text box into which I was asked to enter my thoughts on subjects to be addressed by the paper’s contributors. This is my list of topics.
- ID of “anonymous” sources
- Explanation of why [the paper] has walked away from journalistic standard of corroborating “anonymous” sources with at least two on the record sources [Note: this paper is not unique; the standard has been ignored by all news media]
- Explanation of why we readers should believe “anonymous” sources actually exist
That’s the headline of a Deutsche Welle piece regarding the impact on Europe of President Donald Trump’s withdrawal of the US from ex-President Barack Obama’s (D) Executive Agreement that sought to codify Iran’s “right” to obtain nuclear weapons, if Iran were to have only a little patience and wait until the Agreement’s blocks, such as they are, expire in a few years.
Then Ten Schultz, the author of the article, opened with this statement.
The United States’ withdrawal from the Iran deal, despite the personal pleadings of Europe’s most powerful politicians, has provided one more example that President Donald Trump has no hesitation in dismissing European interests and trans-Atlantic concerns.
This is a preview of
“Iran deal: The European Union’s ugly options”
. Read the full post (517 words, estimated 2:04 mins reading time)
…the door hit them in the fanny on the way out.
About a dozen Google employees are resigning in protest over the tech giant’s involvement in Project Maven, a controversial military program that uses artificial intelligence, Gizmodo reports.
Maven is a DoD project for developing an AI capability to quickly process vast amounts of drone-generated data for human decision-makers. Such a capability, if successfully developed, would enhance our war-fighting—and especially our war-winning—capability.
These ex-employees should consider their view of citizenship in light of their view that the US should not be allowed to take steps to defend itself.
Much has been made over the last week, both favorably and unfavorably, of the magnitude of President Donald Trump’s erasure of ex-President Barack Obama’s (D) legacy.
I disagree with that coverage. Trump has been mitigating, if not correcting, as many of Obama’s errors as he can, but he’s done nothing about Obama’s legacy, which includes the following far from exhaustive list:
- apologizing to the world for our successes
- bowing to world leaders, deeply on several occasions
- alienating our friends and toadying up to our enemies
- attacking Israel for insisting on defending itself
It’s epitomized by a carefully unsigned piece in Spiegel Online, coming only from “Der Spiegel Staff.” After you’ve read it, you’ll see why the author(s) were too embarrassed to sign their names to it.
…Trump’s Tuesday announcement that the US was withdrawing from the nuclear agreement with Iran, one of the core pieces of international diplomacy in recent years….
New York City has a program, Expanded Success Initiative, that was intended to improve the city’s K-12 “black and Latino males'” (apparently, the girls just don’t matter in New York City) performance. It’s failing; although, the piece at the link is more optimistic than that.
Students…reported better school relationships and more fair treatment than peers in comparable schools outside the program.
Socialization does matter in a child’s development; however….
[A]cademic outcomes and suspension rates remained roughly similar to those in the comparison schools.
Academics are the primary purpose of schools. ESI improved nothing important.
State and local governments are at it again. Or still.
The value of investments by public pension funds declined last quarter, widening the gap between what these funds say they will earn and what they actually earn. Pension fund managers—especially government pension fund managers—must make annual “estimates” (they’re actually politically self-serving pie-in-the-sky claims) of the market returns they expect to make on the funds under their nominal care. These WAGs determine the amount of money “the government that is affiliated with the pension fund must pay into it”.
The dishonesty of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s case against ex- and brief-Trump Campaign Manager is made manifest in the opening questions Eastern District of Virginia Federal Judge TS Ellis III and Michael Dreeben’s (arguing for the Mueller side) answers.
Apparently, if I look at the indictment, none of that information has anything to do with links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of Donald Trump. That seems to me to be obvious because they all long predate any contact or any affiliation of this defendant with the campaign.