Here’s what nearly eight years of Progressivism, accomplished by President Barack Obama (D) and his Progressive-Democrat acolytes in the Democratic Party, have done. As The Wall Street Journal put it:
- largest stimulus spending bill in decades
- nationalized the student-loan industry
- turned the banks into public utilities answerable first to government
All of these have created the slowest recession recovery since WWII. The nominally low unemployment rate that has been achieved is measured against the backdrop of the lowest labor participation rate in 40 years—in two generations. Banks as government-managed public utilities, no longer responsive exclusive to the banks’ owners and creditors—which includes us individual savings and checking account holders? That’s just another means for government to collect revenue.
Senator Tim Kaine (D, VA) is Democratic Party Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s running mate. Clinton said in her speech introducing him that he as a good Progressive candidate, and in a later speech, Kaine agreed with that characterization.
OK. Let’s accept his Progressivism, even though the Leftists don’t entirely agree.
Kaine makes a big deal about his work as a missionary in Honduras. Kudos to him for his contributions to Hondurans.
But we should ask him: what has he done for Americans, say in Appalachia, where his running mate has promised to destroy Applachians’ jobs and make them dependents of government, or in the Ozarks, where jobs are similarly scarce and opportunity similarly limited?
…via Watts Up With That?
On the matter of Earth suffering the fate of Venus [boldface emphasis in the original, italics emphasis added]:
- Venus is closer to the Sun. Venus is aprox 0.72 AU distant from the sun (72% of Earth’s), with a total solar irradiance (TSI) almost 2x that of Earth.
- Venus has a denser atmosphere. The pressure on Venus is 93x that of Earth, the equivalent of almost 1 kilometer under the ocean. This is probably the largest factor causing its high temperature.
- The clouds of Venus are mostly sulphuric acid (not water vapor)—a powerful greenhouse agent.
The Fifth Circuit, in a 9-6 ruling, has said that Texas’ Voter ID law violates the Federal Voting Rights Act and returned it to the trial court to…fix…it.
[The appellate court] instructed a lower court to come up with an “interim remedy” before the November election.
Therein lies a major part of the problem. Regardless of what one might think of the particular law, any alteration to it is a political matter, to be done by the people and their elected representatives. The courts have no authority whatsoever to write law or to rewrite an extant one; indeed, our Constitution explicitly bars the courts from such things.
…and to the way the People’s Republic of China treats its foes, Mr President,
Recall that the PRC was resoundingly crushed in a case brought by the Philippines concerning the PRC’s violations of Philippine waters in the South China Sea, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague having ruled, sharply, in favor of the Philippines on all but the most trivial of the charges.
Recall, also, that newly elected Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte had said—repeatedly—that he wanted bilateral talks with the PRC regarding the South China Sea and the items in dispute.
The Missouri state legislature has a supermajority of Republicans in the House. And legislator, of any party, can require a bill to be read aloud on the House floor prior to the House’s final vote on it. Last spring, Democratic Party legislators initiated a filibuster by requiring each bill being brought up for its final vote to be read aloud. So far, so good. The Republican Speaker one-upped the Democrats by having the bills read by computer with the speed control dialed up. Again, so far, so good.
Republicans officially petitioned the administration Thursday to deny Hillary Clinton access to secret information as Democrats’ presidential nominee, and some GOP lawmakers said if the intelligence community won’t do it, they’ll pass a bill to do it themselves.
Oh, wait—it’s a question because
The White House has said it won’t deny Mrs Clinton access….
On the excuse of tradition, don’t you know.
Never mind the tradition, and the requirement in most serious security régimes—like in a government—of revoking existing security clearances and denying further access to those who’ve committed security violations as egregious as even FBI Director James Comey has documented Clinton having done.
This Hague Court has been hearing the Philippines’ complaint about the People’s Republic of China’s invasion and seizure of the South China Sea, an invasion that occurred at the direct and deliberate expense of the Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, and other nations rimming this Sea. It ruled against the PRC, publishing its unanimous ruling last Tuesday. In its essence, the Court has ruled that the PRC’s Nine-Dash Line, which the PRC used to define the extent of its manufactured historical claim…couldn’t hold water.
China’s claims to historic and economic rights in most of the South China Sea have no legal basis….
Recall that Democratic Party State Attorneys General and the Virgin Islands territorial Attorney General have subpoenaed private enterprises for all correspondence related to objections to political agendas touting climate warming and the need to redistribute wealth to “green” energy crony companies. These subpoenas are intended to gain access to correspondence with anyone at all, and the companies have been threatened by these AGs with RICO proceedings if the victim target companies don’t comply.
In response to that, several of those target companies have countersued, demanding the AGs’ documents related to the AG cases, among other things under FOIA. The AGs have refused to supply the requested documents, citing…secrecy.
This time on private enterprise and a private economy company that’s nominally outside the scope of the government economy.
US tax officials sued Facebook Inc to force the company to hand over documents related a transfer of assets to Ireland in 2010, part of a yearslong investigation into whether some of those assets were undervalued “by billions of dollars.”
Because, of course, John Koskinen and his IRS minions know better how to value a private enterprise than does the private enterprise.
Alternatively, Koskinen has reason to believe the company has falsified its valuations, which raises the question: what’s your probable cause, Mr Koskinen?