Tag Archives: government

Some Later Thoughts on Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Posted on by
Reply

President Barack Obama had this to say, also, in that…speech:

We unequivocally banned torture, affirmed our commitment to civilian courts, worked to align our policies with the rule of law, and expanded our consultations with Congress.

Let’s see how he did that:

He banned interrogation techniques that produced results, after torture had already been banned for years.

He’s been pushing for five years to try terrorists and other illegal combatants as common criminals and to try Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in New York courts or to release them outright.

He interrupts interrogations in progress in order to read the prisoner his Miranda “rights.”

He had his Attorney General drop a voter intimidation case involving the New Black Panthers and their white voter victims after the particular NBP miscreants had pled out.

He’s done nothing material about his DoJ’s program of running guns to Mexican drug cartels.

He’s had his HHS Secretary “encourage” fund “contributions” to his federal health insurance exchange from the insurance companies she regulates.

He’s doing nothing material about his Treasury Department’s IRS (which he falsely claims is an “Independent Agency”) program of targeting Americans and groups of Americans of whom he disapproves for the special treatments of tax audits, invasion of their donor lists, deliberate and prolonged delays on finalizing their tax exempt status applications.

He’s actively covering up his and his State and Defense failures in the run-up to the Benghazi terrorist attack in which an American ambassador and three men attached to him were murdered, their failures during the attack, and their failures in the aftermath.

He’s doing nothing material about his DoJ’s assault on our free press via secret seizure of phone records, emails, and obtaining search warrants by falsely accusing individual journalists of criminal activity.

He’s played a couple of rounds of gold with the House leadership and invited them to dinner, and then he’s castigated them for not kowtowing to him and giving him everything he wants.

That’s a powerful alignment.

No Greater Proof

Posted on by
Reply

David Axelrod, long-time trusted advisor to President Barack Obama, told MSNBC in a mid-May interview,

Part of being president is there’s so much beneath you that you can’t know because the government is so vast[.]

He said this in defending Obama’s claimed ignorance of the doings of the IRS, DoJ’s attacks on the press, and so on.

There’s no greater proof than this of the desperate need to shrink the Federal government, reduce its scope of activity, slash its budget, generally rein it in, and to restore it to the control of the American citizenry.

A Longer View

Posted on by
Reply

Some of what Ben Domenech had to say at Real Clear Politics:

The sudden deluge of scandal which dominates the discussion around President Obama’s administration at the moment has handed a golden opportunity to Republicans.  Yet if they aren’t careful, they’ll squander this opening completely by allowing their intense dislike of the president to cloud their judgment, missing the broader political lessons for the sake of personal point scoring.

And

Here’s the hard thing Republicans have to do if they don’t want this crisis to go to waste: they have to ignore their id….  They must willfully set aside Obama’s presence in the fray…and go after the much bigger prize.  Obama isn’t running for office again.  Liberalism is….  Making this about the inherent falsehood of the progressive project will help conservatism win.   …these scandals cut at the core conceit of Obama’s ideology: the healthy and enduring confidence of big government to be good government.

Given Republicans’ demonstrated skills these last several decades, most recently with the fiscal cliff “negotiations,” though, I’m not sanguine that they can set aside their id, much less glimpse the long view.

An Outcome of Big Government

Posted on by
Reply

The proper lessons of the unfolding IRS scandal are twofold.  First, any effort to have the IRS police advocacy activities of social-welfare organizations is bound to be clumsy and prone to degenerate into either selective or broad witch hunts.  Second, the remedy is not to further limit political speech by nonprofit entities—which would certainly raise significant constitutional issues—but to encourage such speech by imposing fewer restrictions.

That combines with this:

There are two valid takeaways from the IRS scandal [and the other scandals: AP; Benghazi; Sebelius’ HHS “fund-raising” for Federal government’s health exchanges, just exposed this year].  First, it confirms that big government, whose power Obama is bent on expanding, cannot be trusted to behave properly.  Second, it calls for further investigation to determine how high up the chain the wrongdoing extends and whether the administration acted promptly to stop the targeting once it learned of that activity.

The need for an investigation and the firing of miscreants and subsequent jailing of those miscreants whose behavior was criminal certainly is warranted.  However, the IRS’ unconscionable behavior, and the Obama administration’s behavior vis-à-vis the other…scandals…, aren’t unique to the Obama administration.  These are the inevitable outcomes of Big Government, even when that government acts with the best of intentions.

Our Federal government needs to be drastically shrunk in size and scope, returning it to the small, limited, and so controllable, entity that it was designed to be.

A first step in this, in the present context, would be to do away with the distinction between 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations—the legal distinction is wholly artificial and without meaning, anyway.  All entities engaged in otherwise tax exempt activities must be able to engage in some political activity.  That’s at the core of the speech clauses of the 1st Amendment:

Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

There’s nothing in there about “except for when individual Americans or groups of them peaceably assembled are doing certain government-identified things.”

Subsequently, reform the tax code altogether to a single low, flat tax and thereby eliminate the need for tax exempt status for any organization.

This is Amazing

Posted on by
Reply

What a breathtaking failure to communicate.  Regarding the IRS failure to perform, The Wall Street Journal reported this tidbit over the weekend.

The Internal Revenue Service’s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups….

The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration.  He said he didn’t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages….

Thus we now see confirmed what was hinted at during Friday’s House of Representatives hearing concerning the IRS’ misbehavior vis-à-vis its targeting of government-disfavored groups and individuals, and IRS officials’ subsequent dissembling about that targeting.  Senior officials in the Obama administration knew of these misdeeds—or at least the allegations of those misdeeds and the investigation into those allegations—for nearly a year, and for months prior to the campaign season Party Conventions.

Then,

Treasury…said Neal Wolin, the deputy secretary, didn’t notify anyone outside of Treasury….

Then,

White House officials say they learned about the targeting of conservative groups from the [IG] report, and not before.

And yet “White House officials” seem to be lying:

The White House’s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday.

Somebody told Kathryn Ruemmler, that chief lawyer. Then Ruemmler told Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and others members of Obama’s senior cotery.  She told them further, according to Obama (through Jay Carney), that

this is not a matter she should convey to the president.  Her opinion that this is not the kind of thing that requires notification to the president.

This says amazing things about the judgment and competence of the men and women that President Barack Obama has brought into his Executive Branch: they didn’t think it necessary to inform anyone up the chain–that would be the President–that such politically, not to say legally, explosive doings were afoot.

I have no reason to believe that Ruemmler–or McDonough or that cotery–did, in fact, sit on that bomb.

Update: via The Wall Street Journal [emphasis added]:

The Internal Revenue Service briefed the Treasury Department extensively last month about a looming inspector general’s report that would find the agency had inappropriately targeted for extra scrutiny applications from conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, a new timeline of events shows.

The IRS consulted Treasury in late April about its plans to pre-emptively apologize for its actions….

Two people kept out of the loop, according to administration officials, were President Barack Obama and Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew. Neither was consulted, administration officials said, because their staff wanted to ensure that it didn’t appear they had interfered in any way in the process.

Yeah.  I still have that beachfront property north of Santa Fe, too.