The failure stems from an inability to define hate, but mostly it fails from the irrelevance of hate as anything other than a motivator for committing a crime. Motive, though, belongs solely in the jury box during the punishment phase given a conviction of a crime; it should not be foreordained by a Government’s attempt to define the hate or by Government’s more evident attempts to discriminate among groups of Americans and single some out for favorable treatment at the expense of other groups of Americans.
It’s always someone else’s fault with these Democrats.
At a final press conference in Washington, DC Thursday….
Kerry disagreed with the narrative that Obama failed to enforce the red line, however, saying the president did intend to act—but was steered off course after the British Parliament narrowly voted against bombing Syria in August 2013.
The motorboat skipper said this:
The president of the United States of America, Barack Obama, did decide to use force. And he announced his decision publicly and said we’re going to act, we’re going to do what we need to do to respond to this blatant violation of international law and of warnings and of the red line he had chosen[.]
This one is prompted by a Letter to the Editor published in last Thursday’s Wall Street Journal. The relevant part of the letter is this:
If we start at the beginning, it was the US government, including the National Security Agency, that stole information that belonged to me—my phone and internet metadata. Edward Snowden revealed the existence of the government’s thieving. Now Mr Snowden is considered the thief.
Now Mr Snowden is considered the thief. He is, and worse. That the NSA screwed up/stole private data/abused its role/what-have-you doesn’t alter that simple fact.
…the Food and Drug Administration. I’ve written before about the FDA’s shameful obstruction of an experimental drug that showed great promise—before the FDA’s obstruction, so those persons knew all about it—in mitigating Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy to the permanent detriment of the boys who have that ultimately fatal disease.
That’s what John Kerry, the motorboat skipper who sits in the Secretary of State’s chair, claimed Wednesday.
But here is a fundamental reality, if the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic, it cannot be both.
The “choice” of one state is, as even this guy knows full well, a cynically proffered strawman. Israel is strongly in favor of a two-state solution; the only ones who refuse the option are the terrorists polities Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. Absent that strawman dolly, the only thing left is the racist center of Kerry’s offensive sentence.
The Wall Street Journal accurately summed up President Barack Obama (D) regarding his betrayal of Israel with his decision to allow a nakedly anti-Israeli resolution before the UN Security Council to pass unopposed.
The decision by the United States to abstain from a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israel over its settlements on the West Bank is one of the most significant, defining moments of the Obama Presidency.
It defines this President’s extraordinary ability to transform matters of public policy into personal pique at adversaries.
This one at the University of California encountered the reality of identity politics. It collapsed into, as one of the conference-goers called it in her op-ed for the UCLA Daily Bruin, an oppression Olympics.
From the first link:
In one of the larger workshops, one of the students raised a question about why the only issues being discussed were those involving anti-blackness, prompting an African-American student to respond that black students are the most oppressed, to which a Muslim student made a comment about her people being bombed in the Middle East[.]
At least Flip Wilson’s routine was funny. The Democrats’ and their Party’s comedy, though, is just sad.
In no particular order, it’s been low-information voters who didn’t get the message that caused Democrats to lose seats in Congress and ultimately caused Hillary Clinton to lose the Presidential election. Or it was that we’re just too dumb to understand their message. Or it was FBI Director Comey who spiked her campaign. Or it was the Russians who rigged our election. Or it was President-Elect Donald Trump who’s in cahoots with the Russians. Or it became Republican Electors who need to do their moral duty and not vote for Trump. Or it was a mendacious press that had it in for Clinton. And the latest: Bill Clinton’s racist and sexist rant: it was all those angry, white men who didn’t vote for Hillary.
Erik Cafarella had a Letter to the Editor in Friday’s The Wall Street Journal in which he took notice of the added costs of ethanol mandates for our gasoline fuels. The headline of his letter suggested that ethanol should be required to compete in a free market rather than be given a free ride via government mandate.
I offer a redistribution alternative that Progressives and their Democrat cronies should love.
Tax ethanol-laced gasoline, in that competitive market, at a higher rate than unadulterated gasoline. Then send the extra tax money to the poor, whose food costs are elevated by the Federal mandate to produce ethanol.
San Francisco has held itself out as a sanctuary city—a city that will take in and protect illegal aliens from Federal law and Federal law enforcers. Aside from the legal aspects of violating Federal law, this is in keeping with federalism and the 9th and 10th Amendments, and it does not run afoul of Article I, Section 10. Even were such a thing legal, though, it’s a foolish move, but as the motorboat skipper who currently sits in the Secretary of State’s chair has said, in the United States folks have the right to be stupid.