…isn’t losing the White House, although that’s serious enough, likely as it is to cost the nation the Senate and so the Supreme Court; it’s losing the ground up contest that Republicans have been so successful with in the last few elections.
A new generation of Bernie Sanders (Senator, I, VT and Democratic Party Presidential candidate]-inspired political candidates is committing to run for state and local office, the campaign claims, a development some analysts say could shape liberal politics for decades to come….
…[Bernie Sanders’] campaign said 6,700 supporters expressed interest in running; the number was nearly 11,000 counting those interested in volunteering.
It just keeps on keepin’ on.
Officials at the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston and its associated clinics altered records to make it appear that hundreds of appointments canceled by staff were really called off by patients, according to the VA’s Office of Inspector General. The federal audit determined the changes were made to hide unacceptable wait times as VA hospitals around the country were under fire for neglecting patients.
This was for the 12 months ending June of last year, but it’s still after widespread corruption at VA facilities across the nation had been exposed. No one in VA management, apparently, cares a whit about the veterans in their supposed care.
That’s the focus and modus operandi of the Democrats.
Congressional Democrats are renewing their push for gun control measures in the wake of the Orlando terror massacre, arguing the best way to prevent suspected terrorists from carrying out acts of violence is to legally limit their access to firearms.
They’re right this far—certainly such limits would be a large help. The problem is how to do it without disarming American citizens. And that leads to the real problem: Democrats don’t care about American citizens and our right—our obligation—to defend ourselves and each other. Democrats just want us disarmed.
This is a preview of
Tragedy Equals Excuse to Inflict Gun Controls
. Read the full post (332 words, estimated 1:20 mins reading time)
A carefully manufactured one, too. The Wall Street Journal has an accurate read on President Barack Obama’s (D) constructed ire.
“For a while now the main contribution of some of my friends on the other side of the aisle have made in the fight against ISIL is to criticize this Administration and me for not using the phrase ‘radical Islam,'” Mr Obama said Tuesday, using his preferred acronym for Islamic State. “That’s the key, they tell us. We cannot beat ISIL unless we call them ‘radical Islamists.’ What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change?”
Or a terrorist attack.
The debate over how to stop attacks like the terror massacre in Orlando erupted on the House floor late Monday as Democratic lawmakers loudly criticized House Speaker Paul Ryan (R, WI) and other GOP leaders for taking no action on the nation’s gun laws.
Instead of moving to enhance our nation’s and our citizens’ ability to protect ourselves collectively and individually against terrorist attacks, the Left has chosen to focus on their continued efforts to disarm us all.
…the Left are all honorable people. The Honorable Left says Muslims have nothing to do with terror. Hillary Clinton tweeted a while ago that
Muslims have “nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”
Of course, she’s changed her story now that the winds of politics are blowing in a different direction.
Here’s how deadly [sic] wrong she and her Left colleagues are about Muslims and terrorism:
A Muslim radical who was being investigated for terror ties stabbed a French police chief to death outside his home, then tortured the man’s wife in front of their toddler son—all while livestreaming his rampage on Facebook.
A writer for the Huffington Post is defending his recent op-ed that “a violent response” is the “logical” approach to stopping presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.
And PuffHo agrees, through their inaction.
What Jesse Benn wrote in his op-ed Sorry Liberals, A Violent Response To Trump Is As Logical As Any:
[T]here’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this.
Because unpopular speech, rude speech—especially speech unpopular with the Left, speech that’s rude to the Left—must be shut down. At any cost. And others’ right to decide for themselves what speech they will hear must be destroyed. At any cost.
Democratic Party Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is rather well-known for exchanging emails with classified information in them, and for relaying others with classified information in them, via her unclassified, connected to the Internet, personal email server which she maintained in your New York digs. She’s also well-known for her claim that nothing she handled on that server—which was all of her State Department work as well as legitimately personal emails—was “marked classified.”
I’ll skip over the fact that the emails containing classified information were classified by that content, regardless of any markings or lack of markings, and that it’s a felony to mishandle classified materials in that way or any other, regardless of intent.
After acknowledging last week that several minutes of video from a 2013 briefing on the Iran nuclear deal had been intentionally cut, the State Department announced Wednesday that Secretary of State John Kerry has ordered an investigation into who ordered the edit.
This comes on the heels of ABC News having caught the White House altering the transcript of President Barack Obama’s (D) press agent, Josh Earnest’s, briefing about another Iran-related matter.