Now the New Orleans government is requiring children as young as five years old to get vaccinated, whether they need it or not, whether their parents want it for their children or not.
Mayor LaToya Cantrell said she is implementing the policy “to keep the omicron variant at bay,” amid surging cases in Orleans Parish.
“The vaccine mandate will expand to include children ages 5-11,” she said. “We will require proof of vaccination or negative tests at bars and restaurants and other locations for everyone ages 5 and older.”
(I’m not aware that patrons as young as five years are allowed in New Orleans bars, but that’s another story.)
And, she orders:
Starting in January, you MUST ensure that your children are getting vaccinated!
This too closely approaches child abuse. There is virtually no risk to children—or from them to others—from the Wuhan Virus, especially from the mildest of all the variants, Omicron. It’s also true that the risk of dangerous side effects from the vaccines against the virus seems very small.
We have more than two years of empirical data from a sample size that is the population of children on Earth with which to assess the level of risk to children from a Wuhan Virus infection. We have a much smaller set of data, collected over a much shorter period of time, with which to assess any risk to children of serious side effect from any of the virus vaccines.
Stipulate, though, that the vaccines’ serious side effect risk really is quite small. The comparison of interest is not whether the vaccines have an absolute level of risk in isolation of other factors or risks. The proper comparison is the level of risk to a child from being unvaccinated compared with the risk to the child of serious side effect from the vaccine.
If the two levels of risk are comparable—and they seem to be, even with the so-far assessed optimistic side effect risk—then the risk from the vaccine is not worth the risk to a child from going unvaccinated.
Forcing that second risk onto the child is too risky, to the point of abuse.
She’s not only wrong morally, she’s wrong on the basis of the actual data. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565v1
She’s a Progressive-Democrat. For them, it’s never about facts, or hard (or soft) data, or science, or even logic.
The governing Progressive-Democrat says “you MUST.”
It’s solely and strictly [sic] about accruing personal and Party power.