China’s Nuclear Extortion

The People’s Republic of China are publicizing both their capability of nuclear attack against us and the fact that their goal in such an attack is not so much to win a war as it is simply to visit as much destruction on us and to kill as many of us as they can—to eliminate us not merely as a nation, but as a society.

The PRC’s Global Times, for instance, talked freely about the destruction a Chinese nuclear attack, primarily from its submarine nuclear missile force, could inflict on the us.  Nominally, the paper was writing for its domestic readers, but it’s clear the government also was addressing our own leadership.

The GT article contained, among other things, a description of the destruction the PLA could inflict on Seattle, Los Angeles, and other western American cities, and of the radioactive fallout that would spread as far as Chicago.  It also contained this image of the reach of the destruction from their attack:

The shaded areas represent fallout spread 3, 7, and 30 days after the Chinese nuclear attack against our west coast.

The GT then got quite specific about PRC intentions:

Because the Midwest states of the US are sparsely populated, in order to increase the lethality, [our] nuclear attacks should mainly target the key cities on the West Coast of the United States, such as Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego.

The 12 JL-2 nuclear warheads carried by one single Type 094 SSBN can kill and wound 5 million to 12 million Americans.

If we launch our DF 31A ICBMs over the North Pole, we can easily destroy a whole list of metropolises on the East Coast and the New England region of the US, including Annapolis, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Portland, Baltimore, and Norfolk, whose population accounts for about one-eighth of America’s total residents[.]

And

Our JL-2 SLBMs have become the fourth type of Chinese nuclear missiles that threaten the continental United States, after our DF-31A, DF-5A and DF-5B ICBMs[.]

China Central Television; the People’s Daily; the PLA Daily (the print outlet for the PRC’s military establishment, the People’s Liberation Army; the China Youth Daily, the Guangmin Daily all ran much the same stories in a coordinated delivery of the PRC’s message.

The timing of this is curious.  The PRC is moving actively to seize all of the South and East China seas, to the direct detriment of our allies, friends, and trading partners, and so to our own detriment.  It comes, also, after our “pivot” to Asia and the Pacific.  And it comes against the backdrop President Barack Obama’s demonstrated hesitancy vis-à-vis our other enemies.  Why so late after Obama’s reluctance to act on the world stage?  Probably because the Chinese have had trouble believing an American President could be so timid.

The result of our lack of response to this will not be pretty.

 

h/t Ricochet (Maybe behind a paywall.  This is a site well worth the subscription fee.)

Conflict of Interest

…or just rank cynicism by a Progressive Know Better government?

President Obama on Wednesday defended his signature health care law in a speech from Boston, saying that people who are losing their insurance plans because of the law should start shopping around for better coverage.

Never mind that these people already had good enough coverage, by definition: it’s the coverage these folks had bought voluntarily.  But President Barack Obama has a solution for all those folks being dumped, willy-nilly, into the market for insurance: shop in his newly opened ObamaMart store.

And

The cancellation notices apply to people whose plans changed after the law was implemented or don’t meet new coverage requirements.  The president said those changes ensure that all Americans are able to get quality coverage.

Never mind that those changes to perfectly fine policies were required in order to meet Obamacare-mandated standards.  Or that those compliance-required changes violated the Obamacare terms for grandfathering so the original policies couldn’t be grandfathered.  But it’s OK; folks who lost their policies can go shop in that newly opened—only by happenstance opened just now, mind you—new store: Obama’s ObamaMart.

And the explicit pitch:

So if you’re getting one of these letters, just shop around in the new marketplace.  That’s what it’s for.

The new marketplace: ObamaMart.

And this: “Only 5% of Americans are in the private insurance market, are getting cancellation notices.”  Only 14 million Americans.  Those 5% are only a small amount of people, according to Juan Williams on last Wednesday’s Special Report with Bret Baier.  But, hey, they can shop around again, so they don’t matter in the larger picture proffered by a Progressive Know Better Government.  They’re unfortunate, but unavoidable, collateral damage in getting the government’s store up and running.  For the greater good.

And for the good of ObamaMart.