Some pundits are complaining about a DoJ run by an Attorney General that is becoming a President Donald Trump ally rather than leading an independent Cabinet facility.
They’re misunderstanding, if not distorting, the situation.
These, for instance:
While those allies [of Attorney General William Barr] believe the attorney general’s actions are justified, they worry he is inviting excessive scrutiny that will undermine his agenda and do nothing to help the Justice Department’s already bruised morale.
Not at all. If the actions are justified, scrutiny—”excessive” or otherwise—is no excuse for not taking them.
In addition, if entrenched careerists in DoJ are unhappy with the changed corporate culture, they’re free to be unhappy on someone else’s payroll.
[Jonathan Turley said,] “This is a failure to consider the optics and impact of this type of announcement….”
This is not a failure at all. A major part of depoliticizing DoJ after the Eric Holder/Loretta Lynch depredations and the failures of the Jeff Sessions/Rod Rosenstein tenure is to take actions because they’re the right things to do, independently of “optics” or “impact of this type.”
Inside the Justice Department, Mr. Barr…is known for impatience when his orders aren’t quickly carried out.
Imagine that—insisting the Department move with all deliberate speed instead of the glacial pace of politics.
This is what independence looks like, and neither Progressive-Democrats nor deep-rooted bureaucrats like it.