Randy Manner (Maj Gen, ret) accused, in his Wall Street Journal…op-ed…former President and Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump of spreading disinformation regarding the Federal government’s response to Hurricane Helene. Tellingly, he opened his jeremiad with his own disinformation.
Donald Trump’s Project 2025 would dismantle these lifelines and force communities to face disasters on their own.
There is no connection whatsoever between Trump and Project 2025. Both Trump and The Heritage Foundation, authors of the document, say so. The only ones who claim otherwise are the press’ imaginary “folks who know” and Progressive-Democratic Party politicians who quote that press.
Manner’s disinformation extends into Project 2025 itself.
Project 2025 would push the privatization of disaster-relief functions currently managed by FEMA….
It’s instructive that Manner chose not to quote the project where it proposes that. He cannot because the project proposes no such thing. Project 2025 itself (pgs 133-134) actually proposes dismantling DHS, which it says is dysfunctional, while saving FEMA by alternatively moving it to the Department of the Interior or combining it with CISA and moving the combination to the Department of Transportation.
Regarding Manner’s dishonest claim regarding privatizing FEMA, what the project actually proposes (pg 135) is
privatizing…the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program….
This is far from privatizing FEMA. Beyond that, letting insurance entities compete in a free market would bring down the costs to insurees, and to us taxpayers regarding government insurance entities, of insurance.
Manner’s distortions and disinformation peddling brings dishonor on the uniform he used to wear.
Regarding shifting FEMA spending, the project does propose
shift[ing] the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities instead of the federal government….
But that’s where the responsibility should lie in our republican democracy. The State and local governments are the entities on the scene (on-scene command is a concept with which an ex-flag officer should be familiar), they know far better than the Federal government what the needs of their citizens are, and being closest to the scene of the disaster area and to those citizens within it, they are far better positioned to provide the immediate aid and targeted support those citizens need than is the Federal government. The Florida State and local governments are empirical demonstrations of this.
Only a Big Government enthusiast, who sees States merely as districts to facilitate the purposes of the central government (as John Jay would have had it at our Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia), would act as though we’re not a republican democracy, not a republic.
Manner should be ashamed of himself for writing such a jeremiad.