…the way the Left sees it. And too many Republican Presidential candidates are misunderstanding the situation.
Recall last week: Republican Party Presidential candidate Donald Trump was forced to cancel a rally in Chicago because “protestors” were out in force intending to prevent the rally from occurring. They then bragged loudly about their success.
Over the weekend, at rallies in Missouri, Ohio, and again in Illinois, “protestors” again attempted to prevent Trump rallies from proceeding, charging him on the stage at rallies they couldn’t block.
These are not protestors exercising their own free speech rights; these persons are actively, cynically, dishonestly trying to prevent others from exercising their free speech rights. These Leftists see freedom to speak as freedom only to speak what the Left approves. These Leftists see listeners’ free speech not as their own choice, but only the choice to hear what the Left will permit them to hear.
We expect this sort of understanding out of the Progressive-Democrat Party Presidential candidates:
The ugly, divisive rhetoric we are hearing from Donald Trump and the encouragement of violence and aggression is wrong, and it’s dangerous. … That’s not leadership. That’s political arson.
The Left’s encouragement of violence and aggression is, indeed, wrong, and it’s dangerous. When will Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders condemn the Left’s assault on free speech, when will Clinton and Sanders condemn the violence their “protestors” threaten Republican rallies with?
It’s especially disappointing, though, to hear Republican Party candidates choose to attack a fellow Republican for being attacked by this assault on speech, carefully not saying a word about the real assault, the one on Americans’ First Amendment right. John Kasich, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz should know better.
Update: corrected a dumb___ typo.