Monthly Archives: December 2013

Why Is Delta Afraid?

Posted on by
Reply

Indeed.  Or, it’s just an abuse of market power?

Paulding County, GA, has an airport, Silver Comet Field, and Paulding wants to have a small air line operate all of four or five flights per day out of it.  Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport is 40 miles away, has five runways, 203 gates, and a 46 million passenger-per-year throughput.  Delta Airlines, which uses Hartsfield for its hub, is feeling so threatened by this dinky little airport that it’s doing everything it can to stifle Paulding’s “competition.”

Holden Shannon, a “senior executive” for Delta put an op-ed into the Atlanta Journal-Constitution worrying, with no irony, that

a second airport can quickly expand, and the impact on Hartsfield-Jackson would be significant.

This, though, is sort of the nature of free competition.  Is this what Delta fears?

Shannon also said competition from Paulding would “threaten Atlanta’s economy.”  But the only form the competition would take would be from price competition, making consumers better off.  Is Delta really so fragile that one more, dinky, entrant into the market will push it over the edge?  Is Delta that badly run?  Is that what Delta fears?

He also complained to the Paulding County Commission Chairman, bellyaching that Silver Comet Field’s plans supposedly were hatched in secrecy.  But he chose not to explain why a business is obligated to form its plans in full view of its competitors.

Shannon isn’t the only Delta executive with his knickers bunched, either.  Richard Anderson, Delta’s CEO, told the AJC that the planned commercial operation would be “an economic and community failure.”  Never mind that that’s not Anderson’s call—that’s for the market and the community to decide.  Is this what Delta fears—that the market will decide in favor of competition?

Hmm….

Obamacare Blocking People from Getting Coverage?

Posted on by
Reply

A Better LA, a decade-old Los Angeles nonprofit, said last week it was signing up 50 low-income people for health plans in California’s health-insurance marketplace.  The charity, which said it has the blessing of the state agency overseeing the marketplace, will pay $50 to $100 a month to cover the share of the people’s premiums not already financed by federal subsidies.

Nonprofits, including some hospitals, say paying premiums would ensure coverage for people currently uninsured who can’t afford even a small monthly payment for health insurance.

But.  There’s always a but. This but is this, from Karen Ignagni, President and CEO of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the health-insurance industry’s trade group (who, incidentally, declines to explain the claimed logistics problem of reissuing health insurance plans that were in force just a month ago):

It is a conflict of interest for hospitals and drug companies to pay patients’ premiums and cost-sharing for the sole purpose of increasing utilization of their services and products.

Of course, Ignagni has no conflict of interest herself.  Mm, mm.

And

[The] HHS unit that is implementing the health law said it would “discourage” hospitals and other commercial entities from paying premiums.  It asked insurers to reject such payments and warned that it would take further action if necessary.

HHS has significant concerns with this practice….

The Democrats and the insurance companies in cahoots with them pretended to concern about the poor and the elderly sick being unable to afford medical care because they couldn’t afford health insurance.  Now those same worthies are moving to block those poor and elderly sick from getting exactly that coverage solely because they’re not getting coverage in the way those Democrats deem acceptable.  Apparently, the Democrats’ concern had nothing to do with the welfare of the poor and the elderly sick and everything to do with getting their votes.

The insurance companies?  It’s time to cut out the coddling and dump them into a free, competitive market place.

Why Are We Abandoning the High Ground?

Posted on by
Reply

China’s first lunar rover has successfully separated from the probe that carried it into space has and made its first track upon the surface of the moon, Chinese state media reported Sunday.

Here’s the rub:

The soft landing—the term for a landing in which neither the spacecraft nor its equipment is damaged—was the first on the moon by any nation in 37 years

And not only was it not done by us, it was done by a nation with clear enmity toward us and toward our friends and allies.  Moreover, the People’s Republic of China is making no bones about its future plans for the moon.  They’re planning a sample return mission in their present Chang’e series as soon as 2017 and an astronaut landing after 2020.

The US’ space program?  Well, we don’t have much of one, and none at all where the moon is concerned.  We send the occasional robot off to Mars (those are spectacular missions, doing important science, to be sure), but that’s about it.  American astronauts have to thumb rides to the space station on Russian rockets.  American private companies are (finally!) figuring out how to send supply missions all the way to the space station.  That’s about it.

As for the moon, we got nothing.

Never mind that the back side of the moon is an excellent platform for exploring space.  Never mind that the regolith on the moon—all that moon “soil”—is rich in rocket fuel (it’s loaded with oxygen and aluminum, each a key ingredient).  Or that producing that rocket fuel on the moon and loading it into rockets there considerably cheapens exploration of the rest of the solar system, since all that mass doesn’t have to be carried uphill out of Earth’s gravity.

Never mind that the moon is militarily useful high ground: rocks dropped from there impact Earth’s surface with force of nuclear bombs, and by destroying our launch facilities, any rock throwers will be able to deny us access to space entirely.  Other weapons launched from the moon will be able to destroy our satellites with impunity, which with no launch facilities, we’ll be unable to replace.

But we’re ceding all of that to the PRC.

Can’t Happen Here

Posted on by
1

Enquiries by the Daily Mail have revealed:

  • Four of the nine-person Climate Change Committee, the official watchdog that dictates green energy policy, are, or were until very recently, being paid by firms that benefit from committee decisions.
  • A new breed of lucrative green investment funds, which were set up to expand windfarm energy, are in practice a means of taking green levies paid by hard-pressed consumers and handing them to City investors and financiers.
  • £3.8 billion of taxpayers’ money funds the new Green Investment Bank, set up by the Department of Business and Skills. One of its biggest deals involved energy giant SSE selling windfarms to one of the new green funds, Greencoat Wind.  The Green Investment Bank’s chairman, Lord Smith of Kelvin, is also chairman of SSE.  The bank says it ‘provided expertise’ to enable BIS to take a £50 million stake in Greencoat, which helped fund the SSE sale.
  • The same bank’s chief executive, Shaun Kingsbury, is one of the UK’s highest-paid public sector employees.  His £325,000 salary is more than twice the Prime Minister’s.
  • Firms lobbying for renewables can virtually guarantee access to key Government policy-makers, because they are staffed by former very senior officials—a striking example of Whitehall’s ‘revolving door’.

The Daily Mail identifies specific players in the Green Charade at the link.

 

h/t Power Line

Rule…Law

Posted on by
Reply

Christopher DeMuth, writing in The Weekly Standard, notes among other things that

Obamacare is introducing a new form of government​—​improvisational government, characterized by continuous ad hoc revisions of statutory law by executive decree. This is a reversion to a primitive form that long antedates our Constitution and rule-of-law traditions.

Indeed.  What DeMuth calls “continuous ad hoc revisions…by decree” is simply rule-by-law.  Something at which the People’s Republic of China has excelled for centuries.  President Barack Obama might well take some advice from those folks.