I’ve written before about the morality of government welfare as a first resort. Here’s a practical reason for cutting back: it’s too big to manage effectively. Here are some failures from that too big to handle:
A postal worker who ran marathons found her race times improved after she began drawing federal disability checks for an alleged back injury.
Another disabled federal employee went scuba diving, skied in Switzerland and did flips on a trapeze. She spent part of her $193,000 in disability payments on a boat named “Free Ride” before she was caught.
A Justice Department lawyer collected $90,000 in annual disability checks after claiming the stress of his job kept him off the job. Apparently the cable TV show he began hosting while drawing disability pay wasn’t so stressful.
15,000 recipients are 66 or older. Six of them are over the age of 100—well past retirement age.
The Federal government compounds this by being disinterested in controlling the failures and the resulting waste of taxpayer wealth being redistributed.
funding for all agencies—about $3 billion per year—is automatically appropriated and run through the Department of Labor.
And
the federal [disability] program does not require employing agencies to order a second opinion. The claimant can pick his own doctor.
If his claim is rejected, he can file for a different disability, as often as he likes.
And
The Department of Labor, which administers FECA for 70 federal entities, doesn’t track fraud referrals and convictions[.]
The program is too large to be properly controlled, and it needs drastic paring back for economic and legal reasons as well as moral.