Editors at The Wall Street Journal correctly decry a Federal district judge’s ruling that ex-White House counsel Don McGahn must testify before the House of Representatives in response to a House subpoena. As the editors put it,
the sweeping ruling essentially eliminates a right to confidentiality between a President and his most senior advisers.
A federal judge says White House aides must answer to Capitol Hill.
Not just any Federal judge: an Obama judge, Ketanji Brown Jackson.
The Jackson’s ruling, though, goes far beyond that. The judge has asserted absolute supremacy of the Legislative over the Executive.
Because checks and balances only run one way. The Legislative is above reproach, and the Executive may not—has no capability to—check or balance the Legislative.
That’s the new mantra of the Progressive-Democratic Party and its supporters, even though they lack the transparency to say so out loud.
Until a judge said so out loud. Thereby also deprecating another coequal branch’s ability to check and balance the Legislative.