Three guys, two of whom parachuted from the top of 1 World Trade Center and the third a ground-based accomplice, have been arrested for the stunt. They’re being charged with felony burglary, reckless endangerment, and jumping from a structure, with the last two being misdemeanors.
Yeah—jumping from a structure.
The burglary and reckless endangerment beefs, ordinarily, would be serious charges, and their legitimacy are what trials are for. But jumping from a structure? Really? That’s just Big Brother, Government, making a law simply because it can.
On looking into the particulars, though, things don’t seem to get any more legitimate. To the extent that the reckless endangerment was limited to the jumpers endangering themselves, Big Government has no legitimate interest. Endangering the public, though? The jump was at 0300. Even in New York City, even around the Trade Center, how much public was there to be endangered?
Even the burglary rap, in this case, seems excessive. This particular charge
entails being in a building illegally with an intent to commit another crime—in this case, breaking a 2008 city law against parachuting off buildings more than 50 feet tall[.]
They’re not even charging these guys with any attempt to steal something, which is what we usually think of when we think “burglary.” Big Government is only using this charge to punch up the “seriousness” of their case.