Now the EU is looking to claim that cheeses originally made in Europe cannot be made anywhere else and marketed under those European generic names: feta and parmesan cannot be made in the US, but only in Greece and Italy, for instance. Never mind that it’s the same cheese made here, the manufacturers have to use different terminology to market their cheeses, the EU is demanding. The EU even is (mendaciously, say I) claiming that feta, for instance,
is so closely connected to Greece as to be identified as an inherently Greek product.
As if that original connection matters at all in a global market. And, never mind that feta produced elsewhere is plainly competitive, if not superior, or there’d be no market for that produced-elsewhere feta.
The AP says that this sort of thing is
important for the EU as Europe has tried to protect its share of agricultural exports and pull itself out of recession. The ability to exclusively sell some of the continent’s most famous and traditional products would prevent others from cutting into those markets.
Never mind that Europe does not own any share of any market; the market is possessed (not owned) by the aggregation of individual buyers and sellers that choose to operate in it. Europe—as with any participant—earns a share of a market by competing effectively in it.
No, this is an issue that needs to be dragged out until after the 2016 elections, and we get a President that has the moral courage to stand up for American, if not free market, interests.