Attacking the Institution of the United States Senate

Senator Jeff Sessions (R, AL) had some thoughts on the matter last Thursday in a Senate floor speech.

Our late colleague Senator Robert Byrd liked to say that there have been two great Senates in history: the Roman Senate and the US Senate.  He understood the special and crucial role the Senate fulfills in our Constitutional Republic.

And

Yet, in the last few years, we have witnessed the dramatic erosion of Senators’ rights and the dismantling of the open legislative process.

We fund the government through massive omnibus bills that no one has had the time to read or analyze.  Senators are stripped of their right to offer amendments.  Bills are rushed through under threat of panic, crisis, or shutdown.  Secret deals rule the day, and millions of Americans are essentially robbed of their ability to participate in the legislative process.

And

One of the tactics by which Majority Leader [D, NV, Harry] Reid has suppressed Senators’ rights and blocked open debate has been a technique called “filling the tree.”  What this means, basically, is that when a bill comes to the floor, the Leader will use his right of first recognition to fill all of the available amendment slots on a bill and block any other Senator from offering amendments.  One man stands in the way of his 99 colleagues.  But, not alone really.  His power exists only as long as his majority concurs and supports his actions. This…prevents Senators from being held accountable by their votes on the great issues of the day.

In so doing, the Leader denies the citizens of each state their equal representation in the Senate.  Majority Leader Reid, in his effort to protect his conference from casting difficult votes—in order to shield his Majority from accountability—has essentially closed the amendment process.  He has shut down one of the most important functions that Senators exercise to represent the interests of their constituents.

And

Recently, this tactic manifested itself in a dramatic way.  To the surprise and shock of many, the December spending agreement contained a provision that cut the lifetime pension payments of current and future military retirees—including wounded warriors—by as much as $120,000.  I and other Senators had many ideas for how to fix this problem, but we were blocked from offering them by the Majority Leader.

So I would ask my colleagues: … Do you believe the Senate should operate according to the power of just one man?

There are other avenues of attack, also.

The erosion of the Senate has also been front and center in the budgeting process.  We are now in our fifth year without adopting a congressional budget resolution.  Instead, taxpayer dollars are spent through a series of backroom deals and last-minute negotiations.  Then we face a massive omnibus that is rushed to passage without amendment or meaningful review.  The American people have no real ability to know what’s in it or hold us, their elected representatives, accountable.

And

[U]nder the tenure of Majority Leader Reid, the budgeting process has been totally mismanaged.  We have ceased consideration of appropriations bills altogether, relying more and more on autopilot resolutions and catch-all behemoth spending packages.  In fiscal year 2006, for example, every single appropriations bill was debated, amended, and passed in the Senate.  In 2013, none were.

And

A more ominous development, however, is how the breakdown of the appropriations process in the Senate is now infecting the House of Representatives, and spreading like the plague.  In the first year of their majority, the Republican-led House marked up six appropriation bills and sent them to the Senate.  The Senate didn’t consider a single one.  Last year, the House passed eight appropriation bills and sent them to the Senate.  Again the Senate didn’t act.  This year, the futility of the House efforts began to show as the House passed only four bills.  But why should they?  Why should the House expose their members to politically tough votes when they know the Senate won’t?

Finally [emphasis added],

All of us owe our constituents an open, deliberative process where the great issues of the day are debated in full and open public view.  Each Senator must stand and be counted—not hide under the table.

Remember all of this, as you consider for whom to vote for your Senator in the upcoming primaries and mid-term elections.

The VA Strikes Again

Used to be, veterans could apply for disability via letter, even a hand written note.  Further, when that note arrived, coverage began for the applicant, should his application be accepted, including backdated payments to cover the period between receipt of the application and its acceptance.  Not anymore.

The Department of Veterans Affairs says the many ways that requests for disability compensation arrive actually hamper its ability to administer benefits, and they contribute to a claims backlog that has about 400,000 veterans waiting more than 125 days for a decision.  At times, workers spend so much time trying to figuring out what’s being claimed and trading letters with applicants that it’s slowing down decisions for everyone.

Never mind that the Godfather of the VA, General Omar Bradley, its first MFWIC, told VA staff that they were there to serve the veterans, not themselves.

According to the VA’s bright idea,

the first communication from a veteran may not trigger anything.  Those veterans who put their claims in writing would have to completely fill out a standard form [generally on line], and the clock that determines how far back the government will pay, won’t begin ticking until the VA receives the successfully completed form.

And that form better be filled out correctly.  If it’s not, there’ll be delays, including the possibility the form will be returned “for resubmittal in 90 days for further disapproval.”  Oh, and never mind that critics of this move point out that

veterans who are the most vulnerable—the homeless, those with traumatic brain injury, and those with a limited education—would have the most trouble meeting the new standard.

The VA emphasizes its online form, which is more convenient for the VA bureaucrats.  After all,

The VA said that veterans who don’t have a computer can go to the closest VA facility to get help.

Never mind that lots of veterans, especially those in rural areas and the elderly, either don’t have access to the Internet, or they don’t have a computer at all.

Rule…Law

Christopher DeMuth, writing in The Weekly Standard, notes among other things that

Obamacare is introducing a new form of government​—​improvisational government, characterized by continuous ad hoc revisions of statutory law by executive decree. This is a reversion to a primitive form that long antedates our Constitution and rule-of-law traditions.

Indeed.  What DeMuth calls “continuous ad hoc revisions…by decree” is simply rule-by-law.  Something at which the People’s Republic of China has excelled for centuries.  President Barack Obama might well take some advice from those folks.

Who Lost?

Dunstan Prial at Fox Business, noted that

The Treasury Department on Monday announced that the government has sold its remaining shares of General Motors, and that losses from the 2009 auto industry bailout total about $15 billion.

In a conference call, Treasury officials said the government has recovered about $39.9 billion of the $49.5 billion earmarked for GM under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) approved by Congress as the company teetered on the brink of bankruptcy nearly five years ago.

And

Treasury has intermittently sold its shares of GM but always at a price below that which would have allowed the government to break even on the deal, which accounts for the nearly $10 billion in losses.

And

The government has lost an additional $1.3 billion on its bailout to Chrysler[.]

Leaving aside that the auto industry was not bailed out, nor was it ever at risk—only two failing car companies were at risk—there is another misunderstanding, and one that’s surprising from a business writer.  The government lost nothing on these bailouts.  The government has nothing of its own, and so it has nothing that it can lose.

We American taxpayers lost those $10 billion on GM, those $1.3 billion on that Italian car company, those $15 billion overall.

Free Speech, Progressive Style

A day after he questioned President Obama’s decision to unwind a major tenet of the health-care law and said the nation’s capital might not go along, DC insurance commissioner William P White was fired.

White did acknowledge that the Deputy Mayor who fired him didn’t specifically lay the cause off to White’s reluctance to rubberstamp Obama, but the DM didn’t give any other reason, either.  And the timing of the firing is…curious.

In a statement White issued after Obama announced his ObamaFix, White said in part,

The action today undercuts the purpose of the exchanges, including the District’s DC Health Link, by creating exceptions that make it more difficult for them to operate[.]

A senior city official, carefully speaking only anonymously, said White’s statement should have been sent to Deputy Mayor Victor Hoskins for prior approval first.  So, the DC Mayor reserves to himself the actions of DC Health Link and he reserves to himself authority for determining the validity and legality of insurance policies sold in the district—not the insurance commissioner’s office.

Yeah.  And if the political line isn’t toed, if the political, pre-written speech is not carefully recited, you’re out.

Hmm….