Erin Ching ’16, of Swarthmore College, without a trace of irony:
What really bothered me is, the whole idea is that at a liberal arts college, we need to be hearing a diversity of opinion. I don’t think we should be tolerating [Christian thinker Robert George’s] conservative views because that dominant culture embeds these deep inequalities in our society.
Sandra Korn, ’14, of Harvard:
[T]the liberal obsession with “academic freedom” seems a bit misplaced to me. After all, no one ever has “full freedom” in research and publication. Which research proposals receive funding and what papers are accepted for publication are always contingent on political priorities.
…why should we put up with research that counters our goals simply in the name of “academic freedom”?
This is what we’re teaching at our colleges and universities? Maybe there’s too much “academic” freedom for the students, and not enough teaching of rigorous thinking. Which flows from too much “academic” freedom of a different sort for the professors and their failure to teach the techniques of rigorous thinking.
h/t Robby Soave of The Daily Caller