Homicide Rates

These data are from USAFacts, and they’re at the county level, since that’s the maximum data fineness that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USAFacts‘ source, publishes.

The top 10 homicide rates—homicides per 100,000 population—were in these counties as of 2023 (the latest data available from CDC):

The closest major city is for context; the rates are for the indicated county.

Every single one of these counties is run by Progressive-Democratic Party politicians.

The 10 counties with the largest increase in homicide rates, 2023 over 2018, are these:

Again, the closest major city is for context; the rates are for the indicated county. All of these counties are Party run, also. Given the overlap between high rates and rising rates, it shouldn’t be surprising that at least most of these are Party run.

One item of note here, while acknowledging that these data are a year and a half-ish old, is DC. That county had the third highest homicide rate and the ninth highest rate of increase in its homicide rate. It seems true that DC’s homicide rate is lower today than in 2023, but it’s still among the highest in the nation.

No less a light than PBS cited a Rochester Institute of Technology report that indicated that DC’s homicide rate per 100,000 had fallen in 2024 to 27.3. What those “fact checkers” chose to ignore was that even in the RIT report, DC’s rate was the fourth highest of the 24 cities that RIT looked at, and it’s still higher than that 2018 starting figure by 33%. That last, though, is my calculation from comparing RIT‘s 2024 value with the starting value in the second figure above. The RIT report did not look at rates of increase of homicide rates.

Yet this is the poor performance of DC’s governance that Party is so desperate to defend as they zealously oppose President Donald Trump’s (R) concerted effort to clean the place up.

Disingenuous

The Canadian government has ordered binding arbitration in the dispute between Air Canada and its flight attendants union, the latter which struck the airline a week ago last Saturday. The union is crying foul over not having gotten its way, accusing the airline, in typical union fashion, of sandbagging (the union’s term) the negotiations.

On the other hand, there’s this, also, from the union regarding those negotiations.

The airline said it offered its flight attendants a 38% increase in total compensation over a four-year period. The proposal also offered a 12% to 16% rise in hourly pay in the first year. The union said the pay offers failed to help its members recover after historically-high inflation this decade.

Leave aside the minor fact that the airline didn’t cause the inflation, the Canadian government’s response to economic factors did, so the union’s beef regarding the effects of inflation is properly between it and the government.

What the union is choosing to ignore in its inflation beef is that the airline suffers just as much from that historically-high inflation and must also deal with the resulting price increases and current elevated price levels.

Lack of Message, Lack of Followers

The Progressive-Democratic Party is illustrating its failure to say what it is for, only its skill at saying what (who, really) it is against, and that is showing up in its lack of overt support among us Americans.

For instance:

Crowds on Demand CEO Adam Swart told Fox & Friends on Friday that his company has received 400% more paid protester requests this year than during the same period last year.

Crowds on Demand brags openly that it’s

your home for impactful advocacy campaigns, demonstrations, PR stunts, crowds for hire, and corporate events. Services available nationwide.

Apparently, Party is having so much trouble selling its non-message—and has been for some time—that it can’t even put together a protest of its own consisting of supporters or even of spontaneous Leftist joiners. It must hire artificially enthusiastic pretend supporters to flesh out even its protests in support of what it’s against.

State and Party Affiliation and Comings and Goings

The following two tables show U-Haul‘s annual report on one-way interstate rentals, coupled with the party that runs the State. The first shows top 10 most favored destination States according to U-Haul‘s report, the second the 10 most departed-from States. In both cases, the number following the State is the State’s rank in U-Haul‘s preceding year ranking. 

Rank State Party Control
1. SOUTH CAROLINA (4) Republican
2. TEXAS (1) Republican
3. NORTH CAROLINA (3) Democrat Governor, Republican Legislature
4. FLORIDA (2) Republican
5. TENNESSEE (5) Republican
6. ARIZONA (8) Democrat Governor, Republican Legislature
7. WASHINGTON (7) Democrat
8. INDIANA (27) Republican
9. UTAH (13) Republican
10. IDAHO (6) Republican

 

Rank State Party Control
41. CONNECTICUT (42) Democrat
42. MARYLAND (44) Democrat
43. MICHIGAN (46) Democrat
44. LOUISIANA (45) Republican
45. ILLINOIS (48) Democrat
46. PENNSYLVANIA (38) Democrat Governor and House, Republican Senate
47. NEW YORK (43) Democrat
48. NEW JERSEY (47) Democrat
49. MASSACHUSETTS (49) Democrat
50. CALIFORNIA (50) Democrat

There would seem to be a hint here.

 

H/t Ricochet and Ekosj.

Is The Left Nothing but a Bunch of Karens?

Recall the hue and cry being raised over a good looking woman making an ad for blue jeans. It’s an emphatically one-sided hue and cry, though.

A clear majority of US voters who said they had seen the ad…according to a Napolitan News Survey. 70% said it was a typical ad, while 23% said it promoted white supremacy, and 7% were unsure.

Nobody in the middle or to the right of the middle thought anything of the ad other than it was an ad for jeans. That leaves the Left.