…but a correct rationale, also.
US District Judge Henry Hudson upheld Virginia’s voter ID law that requires prospective voters to show a State-approved photo ID before they vote. In response to the Democratic Party’s (it was the plaintiff, of course) claim that the law was politically motivated, Hudson held in part
The court’s mission is to judge not the wisdom of the Virginia voter ID law, but rather its constitutionality[.]
Hear, hear. Hudson went on:
While the merits of this voter identification law, and indeed all aspects of Virginia’s voting regime, can be reasonably debated, it remains true that Virginia has created a scheme of laws to accommodate all people in their right to vote[.]
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that a key provision of the District’s new gun law is probably unconstitutional, ordering DC police to stop requiring individuals to show “good reason” to obtain a permit to carry a firearm on the streets of the nation’s capital.
US District Judge Richard J Leon found that the law violates the “core right of self-defense” granted in the Second Amendment….
And another protection of our individual liberties. Here’s what the 2nd Amendment says (again, for those of you steady readers of this blog):
This is a preview of
Another Right Answer by a Federal Trial Court
. Read the full post (246 words, estimated 59 secs reading time)
Zhang Dejiang, Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, and so the number three man in the People’s Republic of China’s government is on an inspection tour of Hong Kong this week. The Wall Street Journal‘s op-ed on the matter has a surprisingly naïve subtitle: …it’s a chance for China’s No 3 to hear local voices.
There’s this instead, though.
Officials say that 6,000 police will be on patrol and equipped to lock down roads and walkways whenever Mr Zhang moves about during his three-day stay.
Media interviews won’t be allowed during official events.
The 9th Circuit is going to release, soon, its ruling on a lawsuit that involves California’s claim that it can mandate that firearm manufacturers incorporate safety devices into their firearms.
Anthony Hakl, a lawyer for the state, said the gun-rights groups sought to establish a constitutional right to purchase any handgun of one’s choice from whomever one chooses.
“No such right exists,” he wrote in a September brief.
It’s impressive that a highly trained lawyer should make such a statement with a straight face. Alternatively, it’s depressing that our law schools do such a poor job of teaching our Constitution.
Moves in Congress to link billions of dollars in new medical research funding to revised standards for drug and medical-device approvals are troubling some public-health experts, who say the combination makes it too easy for lawmakers to support lower patient-safety standards.
This is a cynical distortion of the situation. With the FDA’s suppression of Sarepta, a drug that has helped—a lot—boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and that, so far, has shown no deleterious side effects standing as a shining example, of course it’s necessary for Congress to exercise its power and authority of the purse string to bring an out of control, scleroticlly bureaucratic agency to heel.
…is back before the 4th Circuit, this time for an en banc hearing, after an earlier 3-judge panel had vacated the prior trial court’s ruling upholding the law. At issue is Maryland’s
Firearm Safety Act of 2013 banned possession of firearms designated as “assault weapons,” a broad category that includes dozens of types of high-capacity weapons, including the popular AR-15 rifle. Maryland also banned sales and purchases of ammunition magazines of more than 10 rounds among other provisions.
The Maryland Attorney General, Douglas Gansler (D), is arguing
…AK-47s, the state argues, are “suited, for military-style assaults,” not sport shooting or self-defense….
Now Susan Rice, President Barack Obama’s (D) National Security Advisor, is at it.
Too often, our national security workforce has been what former Florida Senator Bob Graham called “white, male, and Yale.”
By now, we should all know the dangers of “groupthink,” where folks who are alike often think alike.
Without tapping into America’s full range of races, religions, ethnicities, language skills, and social and economic experiences, we’re leading in a complex world with one hand tied behind our back.
Holger Schmieding, London’s Berenberg Bank Chief Economist, is dismayed that the UK might quit the EU. The subtitle of his op-ed piece in the WSJ fully sums up his concern:
Rules from Brussels can border on the absurd, but what hurts the UK most are the policies its own politicians enact.
It also demonstrates how badly he misses the point of the movement to leave the EU. It’s certainly true that Parliament is fully capable of enacting, and it often does enact, utterly foolish policies. But at least they’d be sovereignly done, and not forced on them by a remote, extra-national quasi-government.