Used to be, brewers could send their spent grains, the leftovers after their brewing is done and the beverage…decanted…to ranchers to add to the latter’s feed supply. Now, though, the FDA is “proposing” a set of regulations that would require brewers to treat their spent grains as pet food(!), meaning these leftovers must be dried and packaged without human contact.
This is expensive—too expensive for most brewers to handle. Their landfill alternative isn’t any better: one Chicago brewer says it would cost him $100,000, every year, to send his leftover grains to a landfill.
All those free perks, ranging from free food in company cafeterias, laundry services, and so on: Uncle Sugar now is looking to tax those things. They’re in the stage currently of trying to discern who benefits—the company, which gets better productivity, or the employee who gets the goody—so the IRS can levy the tax against the “proper” target.
To what extent is this intended as a perk, a form of compensation, for the benefit of the employee, or to what extent is this just another way the employer gets the employee to work harder and longer and do things for the benefit of the employer? [David Gamage, Assistant Professor of Law at UC, Berkeley] said.
A Federal judge’s oath of office, or adherence to superior court precedent? To be sure, both hierarchy in our judiciary and the precedence of rulings are critical to rule of law and to the US remaining a nation of laws and not of men. But so is a judge’s adherence to his oath of office, and so is the Constitution.
Here’s the oath:
I, _________, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.
So much (to pound the dead horse) for rates going down $2,500 per, courtesy of Obamacare.
The research team at investment bank Morgan Stanley surveyed 131 brokers, finding that December 2013 rates are rising in excess of 6% in the small group market, and 9% in the individual market.
But that’s just chump change, so far (except for the victims of the rise).
[H]ealth plans are also predicting higher cost trends in 2014, after years of stabilization (much of it attributable to the economic downturn [and its long-term non-recovery, say I], which reduced medical utilization rates).
KT McFarland has some thoughts. After taking notice of President Barack Obama’s foolishness in worrying that supporting the victim of Russian invasion in any material way might antagonize the victim’s attacker, she suggests [emphasis hers]
First, if the Ukrainian people want to fight for their freedom, we should help them. …with intelligence, communications, and logistics.
If it comes to a civil war, the fighting will be short and bloody, and Russia will win.
Second, we should shore up our NATO allies. We should reverse course and build the missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic.
…on women and on minorities in general continues apace.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10 an hour would kill off 500,000 jobs…57% of those jobs are held by women.
Women would be disproportionately harmed: those 57% work out to a loss of 285,000 jobs for women. I suppose, though, that given this administration’s current buzz, President Barack Obama and his coterie view this as a general good.
Obama’s war is just as devastating on other groups of Americans whom his mouth holds in high favor, but his actions plainly disdain. The Employment Policies Institute has some of the sordid details.
..in the arena for ideas, again by Progressives. This time as they attack children in New York for having a different idea.
A 13-year-old at Orange-Ulster BOCES in New York was suspended for two days last week for the heinous crime of telling her classmates and friends that they did not have to sit for Common Core examinations. Never mind that she was telling the truth—the exams are entirely voluntary. Never mind that the word had to come from her because the school administration, in their transparency, had withheld this information from parents.
Here’s an interesting graph from AEIDeas:
What this illustrates is the outcome of the lack of a market for organs to be transplanted, in this graph, specifically kidneys.
As Mark Perry put it in his article [emphasis his],
While the annual number of kidney transplant operations has remained relatively flat since 2005 in a range between about 16,500 and 17,000, the number of registered patients on the waiting list continues to increase. From about 65,000 registered patients in 2005, the waiting list for a kidney transplant has increased by more than 50% over the last eight years, and by 35,000 patients, to the 100,019 patients who are currently on the kidney waiting list.
This is a preview of
On Denying Market Forces vis-à-vis Supply and Demand
. Read the full post (353 words, 1 image, estimated 1:25 mins reading time)
…to continue shedding light on this man, and on Progressivism and the Democratic Party generally.
Nevada’s Democrat Secretary of State [Ross Miller] says he’ll do all in his power to crush a conservative organization that ran ads against him in his campaign to become the state’s attorney general.
As Secretary of State, he’s also the one who oversees elections—including the one in which he’s running.
And he’s doing his “Stifle, Edith” act because he doesn’t like a political ad being run by the State Government Leadership Foundation. If you’re curious, the ad is here, but the content isn’t particularly important.
…at Brandeis University, had the school’s…management (I hesitate to say leadership)…not been so cowardly. Following is excerpted from her op-ed in The Wall Street Journal (RTWT).
So I ask: Is the concept of holy war compatible with our ideal of religious toleration? Is it blasphemy—punishable by death—to question the applicability of certain seventh-century doctrines to our own era? Both Christianity and Judaism have had their eras of reform. I would argue that the time has come for a Muslim Reformation.
Is such an argument inadmissible? It surely should not be at a university that was founded in the wake of the Holocaust, at a time when many American universities still imposed quotas on Jews.